That’s what I’d be asking you?
I believe their TOS changed over the years, but it beggars belief that they would actually spell out their right to manipulate content or shadow ban for political or religious purposes in a way that users would consent.
I’m sure the language is tricky, but the level of trickiness would be commensurate with the level of fraud.
One a person posts on Twitter or Facebook, the content belongs to and is controlled by the social media platform.