Posted on 08/05/2018 2:01:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
Three-card Monte is a centuries-old con game in which the dealer and his shills trick the unsuspecting mark into betting on a rigged card game. Only the dealer and his people know where the winning card is, though the mark believes he's smart enough to find out where the winning card is buried.
The public – in this case, the mark – has been led to believe that the entire years-long Mueller investigation was into Trump's "collusion" with Russians. But the dealer (Mueller himself) knows that it is part of a plan to undermine the president and reverse the 2016 presidential election, in which the only real Russian collusion was with Hillary. By now his press supporters surely should know this, but they continue to feed the fiction that the game is to find the collusion in the one campaign in which there was none.
A recent Harvard-Harris poll shows that the universe of marks is getting smaller: sixty prevent of Americans believe that the FBI demonstrates bias against the president and has set out to wound him politically. Mueller's popularity keeps plummeting. By mid-June (the last figure I've seen), "a record 53 percent [are] now saying they view the lead Russia investigator in an unfavorable light. That's a 26-point spike since July [2017], when the poll first started asking voters whether they viewed Mueller favorably or unfavorably. ... Thirty-six percent of all registered voters are also seeing Mueller unfavorably, which represents the highest level since the polling first raised the topic 11 months ago. Back then, 23 percent of all voters said they viewed Mueller negatively."
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Watching all this crap show lead me to ask one question that I notice the Brown Shirt MEdia apparently didn’t even have the curiosity to ask. How can a guy show up in the Ukraine in a suit and nothing more than a briefcase do ANYTHING that is worth $60 Million dollars? Just what in the hell “service” does a “political consultant” provide to a crap hole like Ukraine that could possibly be worth $60 Million? IMHO once you realize that this question was NOT asked and that as it became a glaring flaw in the not asking is why the whole Manafort thing is being “shut it down, nao!”
Bueller?
At a MINIMUM Mueller and his minions should be in federal prison.
“Who will protect us from our protectors?” - Mark (R.I.P.) Scott
Manafort had help from others:
Tony Podesta(John Podesta/Hillary Clinton)
Greg Craig(Bill Clinton/Obama)
Mueller is just the junkyard attack dog. Rosenstein is the junkyard owner and can call off the attack.
It seems to me this is a fairly obvious money laundering operation. I mean, be serious. $60 Million for a “political consultant” for a country with a GDP the size of New Hampshire (sorry if I am offending New Hampshire). Which makes me think TPTB have played their hand badly. What if this was a Uniparty mechanism to launder money and reward their loyal soldiers? What part of this story would be different were this true? I mean, we KNOW that a prosecutor looked at this in 2010 and decided not to pursue this. Even now that Mueller is using Manafort to pursue Trump it is clear they don’t want to really raise questions like this. If you ask me this is serious evidence of Deep State malfeasance and the Brown Shirt Media is helping cover it up. How in the hell am I the only person in the USA that is curious about just what service was provided that is worth $60 Million?
Biden’s kid was in on the Ukrainian payola.
See what I am saying? Podesta, Biden, who else was in on this? Seems to me if we want to hurt the Deep State this would be a good place to start. Of course, if the GOP (Ryan, Mitch) were “in on it” they would not be excited to pursue this. Could explain a lot.
Maybe I should rethink my tag line. Maybe gummint CAN redistribute wealth to “certain people”.
“U.S.-led plot to oust Moscow-backed Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych and steal all of Ukraine’s gas. However, whatever the practical reality of this posting, its symbolic nature makes it look very bad.”
Now,Now,Now. Hmmmm!
The more I look at this the more convinced I am that the Bushes also had a hand in it. The cabal was counting on either Jeb or Hillary being elected to protect the cabal’s corruption.
I believe that Jeb was the designated “loser” so that his “sister-in-law” could make history and become the first female president and being grateful to Jeb she would give him or George P. a plum assignment. After Hillary’s win they would all be home free to either continue business as usual or to bury it.
Think about how angry the Bushes were at Donald Trump. Surely the names that Trump called Jeb were no worse than what the Clinton machine called W and HW. No, the implacable anger at Trump was more than him calling Jeb names.
Plan “B” was Mueller interviewing for the Director of the FBI position again they would be home free with Mueller burying it all. When that didn’t happen they had to go into high gear and appoint a “Special Counsel” who also hinders any real investigation into the corruption.
Sessions is just a useful idiot who can be manipulated and silenced more easily than even Rosenstein thought he could be.
It is time to face facts that our government is totally corrupt and has been for who knows how many decades.
Yep. Probably many more than we know about.
So the real goal was to deprive Moscow of Ukraine’s Natural Gas?
As this Kabuki Charade drags on I have to admit your answer appears more and more likely. Deep Corruption on both sides of the aisle.
The vast majority have dirty hands from feathering their nests.
If you live in a glass house, you dont throw stones.
Most politicians walk a tight rope but there is a pot of gold at the end.
Politicians have to lie to the voters while doing the bidding of the donors and all the while growing their personal portfolios.
No one wants to rock the boat lest they end up in the water.
And I am all out of metaphors.
Who in the cabal had influence to sell? And who is well known for being willing to sell?
Manafort?
Tony Podesta?
Tad Devine?
Who had a connection to a person described in the first two sentences?
Manafort was working for the pro-Russian Ukrainian Party, the Party of Regions from 2007-2012.
Who was in a position of influence and was a willing seller. Given the amount of foreign government donations, it must have been well known worldwide that this person was a willing seller.
Manafort—Tony Podesta—John Podesta—Hillary Clinton. That connection would be worth more than $60 million.
Manafort made the sale, hired the Podesta brothers who had the connection to the person of influence, Hillary Clinton.
See what I am saying? Podesta, Biden, who else was in on this? Seems to me if we want to hurt the Deep State this would be a good place to start. Of course, if the GOP (Ryan, Mitch) were “in on it” they would not be excited to pursue this. Could explain a lot.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
might be easier to make a list of those pols that ain’t in on the take?
And many of us are out of time and patience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.