[equaviator]

Records that were sealed (like his birth certificate and his school records) of his political opponents were magically unsealed just before elections so that the opposing party didn't have enough time to field a viable replacement.

Are you saying that even prior to both of his campaigns, some or all of Obama's Republican opponents' records had been sealed in the same way and for the same reason(s) that Obama had to have his sealed, but theirs were "magically unsealed" (October surprise?) before each of those two elections ('08 and '12) to run interference on the campaigns of McCain and Romney...and that the Republican Party might have replaced their '08 and '12 nominees if not for the unsealing and subsequent leaking of "actionable intelligence" on other Republican candidates by the Democrats and Drive-by media? I wouldn't have put it past them then, and seeing as how they're so desperate to recapture the old 'magic' of the '60s, '90s and the Obama years, they're more willing than ever to take even bigger risks because "by any means necessary" means exactly what it says.

[fella]

You are assuming to much. And are liberal with putting words into my mouth.

If you knew anything about “The Great ObamaNation’s” rise to power you would know that in his election to the Illinois legislature and again in his campaign for the U.S. Senate his minions were able to unseal sealed court records involving his opponents. In the Senate race it was a torrid divorce settlement that contained numerous salacious accounts involving the “Seven of Nine” actress.

In both cases his opponents withdrew forcing the GOP to put replacements in way to late. In the Senate race it was Alan Keyes who would have been an excellent Senator and who could have won had he had the time.