Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Irony alert: EPA finds ethanol is environmentally damaging
hotair.com ^ | 8/4/2018 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 08/04/2018 5:32:26 PM PDT by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: 50mm

“Kills engines.”

It’s know to kill small engines and the very old engines.

But my 2001 Tahoe has 211,000 miles on it and every mile was on ethanol blend.

It runs great.

Still.


21 posted on 08/04/2018 5:51:50 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I have known this from known, public science studies for at least 15 years if not longer. Groundwater is polluted worse from ethanol gas than just pure gas.


22 posted on 08/04/2018 5:51:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

the only good ethanol as gas additive is for the corn holes that profit from it.


23 posted on 08/04/2018 5:54:14 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

264K on my 2008 Dodge Caravan using blended fuel.


24 posted on 08/04/2018 5:57:15 PM PDT by Wu (Excuse me while I kiss the sky......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wu

If it’s like my Tahoe the rest of the vehicle is falling apart waiting for the engine to die.

It’s a rattler. Small stuff breaks all the time.

But engine and transmission are still solid.


25 posted on 08/04/2018 5:59:08 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
I'm happy for you.

I'm also happy that in Florida where I now live, ethanol-free gas is readily available, unlike the corn farmer run state I left. As a bonus, I get 10-15% better gas milleage.

26 posted on 08/04/2018 6:00:44 PM PDT by 50mm (-.. .-. .. -. -.- / --- ...- .- .-.. - .. -. . /)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

Yes, it is, but here in Iowa, our senators and reps are pushing for more of it. I sent an email to my congressmen expressing my opposition to the ethanol mandates, but I’m sure my puny opinion is nothing compared to the clout the farm lobby has.


27 posted on 08/04/2018 6:02:17 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (".... and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed." Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
Your altitude may vary. 👹⛽️
28 posted on 08/04/2018 6:06:13 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

You mean contributions right? Or does clout mean contributions in Iowa.


29 posted on 08/04/2018 6:07:33 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Yeah... pretty much the same thing. As Rush pointed out, all politicians really care about are donors and their cash. Pols pretend to give a rat’s butt about what voters think.


30 posted on 08/04/2018 6:16:11 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (".... and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed." Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Ethanol would quickly end if all farm equipment were mandated to use only E85 ethanol or biodiesel. Farmers love the corn subsidy, but won’t use that crap in their farm machinery.


31 posted on 08/04/2018 6:20:27 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

They might want to mandate more of it in Iowa, but I made sure to fill up in Missouri so I don’t have to pay the inflated Iowa gas prices.


32 posted on 08/04/2018 6:24:31 PM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Here’s a quote from one of the posters on the Arizona page: “What a great station to have in Prescott. My son’s Honda Civic jumped from 29.3 MPG to 53.3 MPG in just one tank of E0 gas”

I’ve noticed from the very few times I’ve been lucky enough to use ethanol-free gas that I get about 10-15 mpg more per 10-gal tank. The whole thing is crazy.


33 posted on 08/04/2018 6:28:12 PM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

I think I will join you.


34 posted on 08/04/2018 6:29:08 PM PDT by cannonball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

ping


35 posted on 08/04/2018 6:33:50 PM PDT by Clay Moore (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Folks lets get beyond your feelings on the issue.

Ethanol is the cheapest, easy way to increase octane in our fuel. Now all here, I assume, understand octane and it’s role in engines, right...………………………………….

Nothing is perfect. Ethanol has a role and all the knowledgeable people here understand that, right...……….


36 posted on 08/04/2018 6:34:22 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I was getting very tired of the ads proclaiming what a great thing the ethanol fuel is. The other day I heard one proclaiming that ethanol aided the ground-level ozone problem(didn’t know we had one). I thought that sounded suspicious,so I researched it a little & it seems that the opposite may be true. Well,maybe ethanol is still a good thing....it keeps people employed making something that nobody really asked for or wanted,much in the same way as our Congress works.


37 posted on 08/04/2018 6:34:25 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

And they keep studying and studying and need evermore giving grants to decide if oxygenates are carcinogenic although they suspect they may be. More grants, please! Meantime, no interest in a fuel resembling gasoline, that has been shown to eliminate all three major pollutants. Isn’t it surprising to learn that DJT and Governor Perry have bought the boondoggle and are determine to increase the use of ethanol and biomass? DOE is headed for 90 octane using ethanol and biomass. The roads will become like NASCAR races, with flames out the rear spewing pollution.


38 posted on 08/04/2018 6:36:27 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Yeah. That came to mind. No ethanol in gasoline means cheaper steaks (which I can’t afford anymore). Doubtless it will make the price of gasoline go down, too. Now, if we could only get tetraethyl lead reintroduced . . .


39 posted on 08/04/2018 6:37:55 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“A seven-year study concluding results that could have been concluded in 7 hours of 6th grade mathematics.”

And, no doubt, the government spent several million dollars on it.

Rope. We need lots and lots of it.

L


40 posted on 08/04/2018 6:38:01 PM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson