Posted on 08/04/2018 2:11:41 PM PDT by Kaslin
This past week Rush Limbaugh celebrated his 30th year on radio. There was a call from the President. Sean Hannity paid tribute on his TV show.
And CNNs Jim Acosta? Well, Jim just went on being Jim Acosta. Which is to say Jim has become the latest embodiment of just why Rush Limbaugh is celebrated, not to mention needed.
Lets take just one small Acosta moment to illustrate the point - a point that could be made endlessly with all manner of other journos well beyond CNN. I have mentioned this before right in this space. But the best account is from Joseph Wulfsohn over at Mediaite.
Recall back in May that Kim Kardashian, always on the celebrity A-List, came to the White House for a serious chat with President Trump and the White House senior staff - Jared Kushner was on this one. The subject: prison reform. Specifically, Kardashian was pushing for a presidential pardon for one Alice Johnson who had already served, as Wulfsohn noted, over 20 years in prison of a life sentence for a first-time, non-violent drug offense.
Acosta took to the CNN airwaves and said this:
Forget about the fact that Kim Kardashian is here at the White House today and what planet that is anything resembling normal because its not. She shouldnt be here talking about prison reform. Its very nice that she is here but thats not a serious thing to have happen here at the White House.
Wulfsohn did some quick digging and found this about the self-same Jim Acosta:
Besides the fact that Acosta never took issue with the countless celebrities that had visited the White House under President Obama including Beyoncé and Jay Z, George Clooney, Oprah Winfrey, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Bradley Cooper, Rihanna, and Zach Galifianakis, Acosta seems to have forgotten about his own 2015 interview with singer John Legend.
Acosta sat down with the Grammy-winning artist and discussed his music, Black Lives Matter, and yes, prison reform, something Legend at the time was planning on meeting with Obama about. And Acosta was genuinely engaged with Legend during the interview and took him seriously not only as an entertainer but as a political thinker.
The same cant be said about his treatment of Kim Kardashian.
A small moment. But it says everything about why Rush Limbaugh has been a roaring success for thirty years, not to mention the change in the media dynamic that he, all by his lonesome (and it was lonesome for a long while!) brought about.
There are two obvious points from the Acosta story that explain Rushs success.
First, to say, as Acosta did, that Kardashian shouldnt be here talking about prison reform. Its very nice that she is here but thats not a serious thing to have happen here at the White House.? That is what is known as an opinion. Jim Acostas opinion, in this case. It is not a fact.
Second. Acosta never mentions what Wulfsohn discovered - namely that when another A-List celebrity, the liberal John Legend, wanted to lobby the liberal President Obama on prison reform, Acosta agreeably - make that enthusiastically - interviewed Legend with nary a negative word about his celebrity presence in the Obama White House to lobby for exactly the same subject as Kardashian did with Trump.
In short, this snapshot of Jim Acosta at work is a microcosm of how vast swaths of the American public view the mainstream media. They turn on their televisions or pick up their newspaper to see journalists giving their opinions and calling them facts or news. And ever so conveniently they will conveniently leave out real facts that dont fit the opinions they are so determined to deliver to their audience.
Rush Limbaugh was the antidote to this. For three hours a day, five days a week, in a fast-paced show that was as entertaining as it was enlightening, Rush was and is able to cut through the fog of misinformation, untruths and double standards that run rampant in the mainstream media. Eight years later his friend Roger Ailes put together Fox News.
And one-by-one others began to appear on one or both of radio and Fox airwaves to expand on what Rush was doing. As Hannity noted in his Rush tribute this week, conservative talk radio is now a dominant force in American culture - it is everywhere. And not just with national hosts like Sean himself or Mark Levin or Laura Ingraham, but local hosts as well.
The serious contribution that is Rush Limbaugh is a major league big deal. Every day he is on the air he comes in with a reminder of just how biased is the liberal media as illustrated by a recent news story. And the liberal media is the gift that keeps on giving.
The day of Rushs anniversary, as mentioned, President Trump called in. Shortly thereafter CNN was discussing the call, with Wolf Blitzer picking up on Trumps remark that there were evil people in Washington. Rush was instantly on top of this, saying in Trumps defense:
RUSH: What you mean doubling down on his evil people? So hes doubling down on shutting down the government, and hes doubling down on his evil people here in Washington. Wolf, let me help you out. This is so frustrating. Wolf, if youre Donald Trump no. Wolf, youre not Donald Trump. Youre you.
Youre you, and the entirety of the Washington establishment who you love and respect, and you think love and respect you, all of a sudden start reporting stories four or five times a day that everything youve achieved has been because Vladimir Putin or somebody else helped you. That youre not genuine, Wolf, that youre a pretender, that youre a fake, that youre a phony, and this goes for a year and a half.
Suffice to say, before Rush no one could be heard answering back like this because they simply didnt have the platform - and, most importantly, they were not going to be given a platform on the major television networks of the day. There are thirty years worth of examples of Rush answering the mainstream liberal media - and liberals.
Perhaps the classic illustration of just how serious Rushs contribution is came back in June of 1994 during the Clinton administration. President Clinton was flying in to St. Louis for some sort of official event and called in to a local radio show - on a station that carries Rushs show. Clinton was furious, saying on-air:
After I get off the radio today with you, Rush Limbaugh will have three hours to say whatever he wants. And I wont have any opportunity to respond. And theres no truth detector. You wont get on afterwards and say what was true and what wasnt.
This, Rush would later point out, got no serious play in the mainstream media. Indeed, years later Kirsten Powers, then a Fox contributor, but at one point a Clinton aide, admitted she had never heard the story before. Which goes exactly to Rushs point. The Left doesnt want the conservative point of view out there. And the fact that in 1994 Rush was six years in to his show and it was steadily gaining traction was infuriating to Clinton, his reaction typical of the Left.
On occasion there is the thought that at some undetermined time in the far distant future one will see historys final verdict on an event or personality of today. This is in fact a frequent occurrence with presidents. A president like a Harry Truman can leave office with bottom-of-the-barrel poll numbers - and twenty years later historians and the American people take a look back and realize Truman was a great president.
No such wait is required with Rush Limbaugh. He has made - for three decades - an enormous contribution to America and most specifically to conservative media. Make that a contribution to the media, period. Never again will there be a liberal monopoly of the news and how it is presented. And when someone - a Jim Acosta or any other liberal media personality or institution - tries to substitute liberal opinion for facts there will be plenty of people out there to call them out, to disagree, to point out the flaws in the argument at hand.
That is one very big deal in the history of America. And for that Rush Limbaugh deserves every bit of the applause and accolades he has received.
Me too!
I remember when he was losing his hearing. The program when he explained what was going on. How it was gradually and then more quickly advancing. Then a couple of shows later, he did a radio show where his voice was obviously off. There was something very wrong with it. It was painfully disconcerting to listen to him try to get through the program. His voice was too high pitched, and not modulated properly. He could no longer hear himself. That was the last program he did until after he returned with his cochlear implant completed.
Another memorable time was one of the first shows he did after he returned from his painkiller addiction rehab. He was nearly in tears a couple of times as he described the recovery process.
He is, indeed, a national treasure.
I thought Rush was at his best when he said he would only talk to women callers if they sent him their picture first.
I caught Rush on the Radio in 1990. AM radios only in the trucks outside of our 2 way. I think it was 810 or 960 out of Phoenix. Growler Mtns.
Serious Desert.
We first found Rush in 1992, been listening ever since.
No mention of Comcast.
This article is a waste of time.
I call it the Menstral Stream Media...to be collected and absorbed by “pads of truth”...then tossed away!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.