They may have. But if they have, this judge has overruled the SCOTUS and reversed their order. It will have to go before the SCOTUS, now.
The reply should be that the Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue with clarity and that the district judge himself should take the matter up with the Supremes and that any further interference with legislative and executive powers by this judge would be viewed as sedition making the judge subject to arrest. Let the judge prove it before the supremes...not the president.