To: Cheerio
Court after court after court have ruled that the police have no duty to protect.
3 posted on
07/31/2018 7:00:43 AM PDT by
null and void
(Equality is important, but quality is paramount.)
To: null and void
Court after court after court have ruled that the police have no duty to protect.
...
That’s state law I believe. This case would be about equal protection under the Constitution.
13 posted on
07/31/2018 7:36:05 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
To: null and void
Maybe...but discovery in this case may provide evidence that the Mayor specifically told the cops not to act! if that happens the mayor is toast IMO!
19 posted on
07/31/2018 7:58:52 AM PDT by
gr8eman
(Since God has been banished from our classrooms, Satan has filled the void.)
To: null and void
Court after court after court have ruled that the police have no duty to protect. But do they not have a duty to enforce all local and state laws?
27 posted on
07/31/2018 9:00:42 AM PDT by
Ron H.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson