They both have said exactly the same things both statements are also correct. By the way it isn’t a crime so can the article refute that? What contradiction is there saying both that you didn’t do something and that it doesn’t happen to be a crime in any event.
Put them both together and what is being said is this: Trump did not collude, and even if he did, it’s not a crime. i.e. why are we even talking about this?
This thing is only useful during an election year. This means that either the D’s are just so ticked that they had to do it in spite, or it was planned to be a big deal come the 2018 election cycle.
My concern is that it is the latter. It would be interesting if Mueller DOES have a huge case against Trump but is simply waiting for the right time bo bring it forward.
I doubt it, but that is about the only path I see to him and the democrats “winning” on this issue.
The article’s even worse. By saying “As recently as Sunday, the president took to Twitter to repeat the claim” they’re subtly suggesting that the President’s position has changed, which it hasn’t.