[zeestephen]

So, all this anti-AI hysteria is because IBM test software got something wrong?

Maybe that's why they are “testing” it first?

I can report that AI identification of skin cancer - at the visual and microscopic level - is statistically equivalent to identification by dermatologists and pathologists.

I am not aware of any commercially available AI skin cancer software currently in use, but it is only a matter of time.

I will have no problem turning my health care over to AI, as long as I get a detailed written diagnosis, and I have access to high level medical information on the Web to double check.

[Steely Tom]

I can report that AI identification of skin cancer - at the visual and microscopic level - is statistically equivalent to identification by dermatologists and pathologists.

Yeah, when human dermatologists pre-select the images to present to the algorithm, omitting those tumor classes that it's "not trained for."