Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
What is unconstitutional, this bill or something else?

Eminent Domain is federal from the takings clause of the fifth amendment, but it is limited to takings for public use. Kelo perverted that by equating public "use" with public "good." That was the unconstitutional act.

-PJ

4 posted on 07/25/2018 8:14:13 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
Eminent Domain is federal from the takings clause of the fifth amendment, but it is limited to takings for public use. Kelo perverted that by equating public "use" with public "good." That was the unconstitutional act.

Where is "public use" defined in the Constitution? If it isn't then defining it is a power reserved to the states per the 10th Amendment.

12 posted on 07/25/2018 8:27:46 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

Another question I’ll ask is that after the Kelo decision over 30 states passed legislation restricting how eminent domain can be used. Would you rather the federal government was making that decision for them?


14 posted on 07/25/2018 8:36:53 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
Eminent Domain is federal from the takings clause of the fifth amendment, but it is limited to takings for public use. Kelo perverted that by equating public "use" with public "good." That was the unconstitutional act.

I want my language back!

Unchecked, Unlimited taxing power CAN NEVER BE "the Public Good..."

We need an additional law...
The legislature is forbidden to use ambiguous, deceptive, fraudulent and Felonious language in the title of any new Law.

e.g. The Affordable Care Act

16 posted on 07/25/2018 8:47:57 AM PDT by publius911 (Rule by Fiat-Obama's a Phone and a Pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
Kelo perverted that by equating public "use" with public "good."

“Mr. Rearden, the law which you are denouncing is based on the highest principle – the principle of the public good.”

“Who is the public? What does it hold as its good? There was a time when men believed that ‘the good’ was a concept to be defined by a code of moral values and that no man had the right to seek his good through the violation of the rights of another. If it is now believed that my fellow men may sacrifice me in any manner they please for the sake of whatever they deem to be their own good, if they believe that they may seize my property simply because they need it – well, so does any burglar. There is only this difference: the burglar does not ask me to sanction his act.

...

"If it were true that men could achieve their good by means of turning some men into sacrificial animals, and I were asked to immolate myself for the sake of creatures who wanted to survive at the price of my blood, if I were asked to serve the interests of society apart from, above and against my own – I would refuse. I would reject it as the most contemptible evil, I would fight it with every power I possess, I would fight the whole of mankind, if one minute were all I could last before I were murdered, I would fight in the full confidence of the justice of my battle and of a living being’s right to exist. Let there be no misunderstanding about me. If it is now the belief of my fellow men, who call themselves the public, that their good requires victims, then I say: The public good be damned, I will have no part of it!”

-- Hank Rearden, Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand

28 posted on 07/25/2018 9:38:07 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson