Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom'sWorthIt; All
Thank you for referencing that article Freedom'sWorthIt. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"Under state law, guns are not allowed to be carried by those attending public rallies, demonstrations or protests."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

From related threads …

Note that the Founding States had decided that the states did not have to respect the rights that the states amended the Constitution to expressly protect in the Bill of Rights. The Founding States obligated only the feds to respect constitutionally enumerated rights.

So hypothetically speaking, the early states could make gun-control laws like California now has.

H O W E V E R …

When the states later ratified the post-Civil War 14th Amendment (14A), that amendment ratified under very questionable circumstances, the states obligated themselves to also respect the rights that they amend the Constitution to expressly protect, including the 2nd Amendment (2A).



In fact, the congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of 14A, had included 2A when he read the first eight amendments to the Constitution as examples of enumerated rights that 14A applied to the states.

John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See 2nd Amendment about in middle of 2nd column.)

Also, consider that after 14A was ratified the Supreme Court clarified in Minor v. Happersett that while 14A didn't add new rights to the Constitution, it gave Congress limited power to strengthen only those rights that the states amend the Constitution to expressly protect, including 2A.

“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.

Going back to the congressional record, it also shows that Bingham had clarified not only that the states had never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to make peacetime punitive civil laws, but that 14A had given Congress limited power to strengthen constitutionally enumerated protections. This includes 2A protections.

"Our Constitution never conferred upon the Congress of the United States the power - sacred as life is, first as it is before all other rights which pertain to man on this side of the grave - to protect it in time of peace by the terrors of the penal code within organized states; and Congress has never attempted to do it. There never was a law upon the United States statute-book to punish the murderer for taking away in time of peace the life of the noblest, and the most unoffending, as well, of your citizens, within the limits of any State of the Union, The protection of the citizen in that respect was left to the respective States, and there the power is to-day [emphasis added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See bottom half of third column.)

What all this is saying is the following. If parents were making sure that their children where being taught the Constitution as constitutional lawmakers had intended for it to be understood, then most citizens would know that it is perfectly constitutional for ordinary citizens to work with their federal lawmakers to make punitive laws that discourage state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated rights, the 2nd Amendment in this example about California.

But there's still a big problem …

Consider that all roads of corruption in the federal and state governments lead to the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress imo.

In other words, we are still stuck with a corrupt, uniparty Congress left over from the lawless Obama Administration that has a track record for wrongly remaining silent when state actors abridge constitutionally enumerated rights like low-information California state lawmakers are doing with gun-control laws imo.

In fact, career federal lawmakers are now wrongly using the promise of unconstitutional federal gun control laws to buy votes from misguided, low-information voters imo, such voters undoubtedly clueless that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the corrupt feds the power to make such laws imo.

The remedy for Constitution-ignoring federal and state governments …

Patriots need to finish the job that they started when they elected Trump president.

More specifically, patriots now need to be making sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the 2018 primary ballots, candidates who will be willing to make laws to punish state actors who couldn't care less about our enumerated protections.

Patriots then need to pink-slip career lawmakers by sending patriot candidate lawmakers to DC on election day so they can start supporting Trump in weeding the constitutionally enumerated rights abusers out of the system.

And until the states wise up and repeal the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, as evidenced by concerns about the integrity of the outcome of Alabama's and Pennsylvania's special elections, patriot candidates need to win elections by a large enough margin to compensate for the following concerns.


25 posted on 07/21/2018 3:27:55 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

Thanks for the treatise.


29 posted on 07/21/2018 4:26:09 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson