This story still horrifies me. He didn’t “disrupt” the trial, he was outside on the sidewalk. They just didn’t want any publicity about this trial because it’s about Muslims gang raping little white girls, and the British would far rather sacrifice their daughters than offend their Muslim overlords. What cucks. Beyond disgusting.
Exactly
Same here. The excuses I’ve heard for their “secret trials” and “arrest gag orders” are horrific, they’re pathetic excuses to enable corruption. Don’t give me the “protecting the identities of victims” or “making sure the trial has integrity for the defendant”. BS. It’s about having a sham trial for or against a defendant - so if you’re TR you’re screwed, if you’re a muslim gang rapist you get to be out on bail even though convicted (TR was at a SENTENCING hearing when one of the convicts entered with his “prison bag”).
Combine this with their very subjective “hate speech” laws and you have a system designed, purely, to intimidate what people can say and selectively enforce punishment - and do it secretly. It is beyond disturbing.
It was a “sentencing”, there were no jurors that might be influenced, they had already been found guilty.
You would have to believe the sentencing judge feared he might be influenced by something happening unseen or heard out on the street. The same judge that ordered his arrest and went to the window to observe the arrest.
The judge so feared he might be influenced (or appear to be) that he physically sought out...validated if you will...the previously unknown to him potential influence?
You can’t say you fear being influenced and then go out of your way to be exposed to it.