[SteveH]

relevant legal blog article (nb: sympathetic to dems):

https://www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-indictment

ok but ignores some competing info pointing to an inside job for some of the email messages, and also how does one gain convictions over spies not currently in the usa with no extradiction treaty between russia and usa?

[rolling_stone]

how does one gain convictions over spies not currently in the usa with no extradiction treaty between russia and usa?

they can be tried in absentia like browder in russia convicted and ask for help from intepol..

http://fortune.com/2018/05/30/bill-browder-arrested-spain-interpol-russia-magnitsky-act/

[rolling_stone]

how does one gain convictions over spies not currently in the usa with no extradiction treaty between russia and usa?

they can be tried in absentia like browder in russia convicted and ask for help from intepol..

http://fortune.com/2018/05/30/bill-browder-arrested-spain-interpol-russia-magnitsky-act/

[Missouri gal]

Mueller didn't want convictions. Seems he wanted to grant immunity to the Podestas as “witnesses.” No wonder he used Manafort’s old charges. Just covering his and the Podestas’ tracks. Major conflict of interest. I hope the judge calls him on it.