Posted on 07/18/2018 10:12:07 AM PDT by gattaca
Who is the sanctuary city for?
San Francisco provided no shelter or sanctuary for Orlando Vilchez Lazo's victims. But it was certainly happy to provide sanctuary for the ride share rapist while he committed his crimes,
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Monday blasted San Francisco over its sanctuary policy that “shields criminal aliens who prey on the community” by pointing to an illegal immigrant charged in connection to the rapes of four women, The San Francisco Chronicle reported.
He reportedly worked for Lyft at the time, but the company told the paper that there is no indication that the alleged attacks occurred while he was working for them. A spokeswoman said he was “deactivated” after word of the allegations.
ICE officials reportedly “lodged a detainer” for Lazo but noted in a statement that the city’s jail “does not honor” these detainers or “notify ICE about the impending release of aliens in custody.”
It's more important for San Fran to go on protecting its undocumented rapists and killers.
The suspect, Orlando Vilchez Lazo, 36, is being held in jail in San Francisco in lieu of $4.2 million bail and faces life in prison in connection with the rapes of four women who got into his car believing him to be a ride-hail driver, police said.\
On Tuesday, he spoke quietly as he stood before Judge Braden Woods in San Francisco Superior Court to face charges of rape by force or violence, sexual penetration by a foreign object, kidnapping and kidnapping to commit another crime.
We need sanctuary from sanctuary cities.
Here in NJ they’ve imported many illegals into our Hispanic ghettoes, and what really sets them apart is how they view very young females as potential sexual partners. Every group has deviants, but something in their “culture” (or lack of it) makes this completely acceptable. The only other place I’ve seen that is on old “To Catch A Predator” episodes; while the perps were from all races, the Asian/Muslim ones seemed to be genuinely surprised that they may be breaking the law by violating a female minor. You really get the impression it isn’t even a crime in their home countries - and you certainly understand why their females aren’t allowed out unescorted by male relatives; they’d be set upon instantly.
Great line. Sad, but true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.