Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

Ok, I read it.

There is no doubt in my mind that Russia tries to hack us ALL the time.

However, so does China, North Korea, Iran, and even most of our allies.

And we do it, too.

Other than that, it’s a puff piece. I wonder what Alperovitch thinks about—or KNOWS about, the Anwan Brothers...


87 posted on 07/15/2018 8:03:55 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

There is no doubt in my mind that Russia tries to hack us ALL the time.

However, so does China, North Korea, Iran, and even most of our allies.


As do we or we are being fooled that we have a “ counterintelligence agency “

Also tangentially Obama interfered in the Israel elections, but the MSM won’t bring that up.


94 posted on 07/15/2018 8:11:41 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!
Notice that the article was written on October 24 2016, the same time as the Carter Page FISA warrant was obtained. Yes, it is a puff piece, but the article contains the Dem narrative at the time. Some excerpts:

The analyst, a former intelligence officer, told Alperovitch that Falcon had identified not one but two Russian intruders: Cozy Bear, a group CrowdStrike's experts believed was affiliated with the FSB, Russia's answer to the CIA; and Fancy Bear, which they had linked to the GRU, Russian military intelligence.

The involvement of GRU had already been alleged at that time, long before the Mueller indictments.

Alperovitch then called Shawn Henry, a tall, bald fifty-four-year-old former executive assistant director at the FBI who is now CrowdStrike's president of services. Henry led a forensics team that retraced the hackers' steps and pieced together the pathology of the breach. Over the next two weeks, they learned that Cozy Bear had been stealing emails from the DNC for more than a year. Fancy Bear, on the other hand, had been in the network for only a few weeks. Its target was the DNC research department, specifically the material that the committee was compiling on Donald Trump and other Republicans. Meanwhile, a CrowdStrike group called the Overwatch team used Falcon to monitor the hackers, a process known as shoulder-surfing.

Shawn Henry no doubt had good connections within the FBI. I wonder if he was working with Strzok. Notice the Trump mention in an article that was written two weeks prior to election day.

Ultimately, the teams decided it was necessary to replace the software on every computer at the DNC. Until the network was clean, secrecy was vital. On the afternoon of Friday, June 10, all DNC employees were instructed to leave their laptops in the office. Alperovitch told me that a few people worried that Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, was clearing house. "Those poor people thought they were getting fired," he says.

From what we know now, Crowdstrike's efforts were not that effective if you look at the dates of messages released by Wikileaks.

By the time of the hack, however, Donald Trump's relationship to Russia had become an issue in the election. The DNC wanted to go public. At the committee's request, Alperovitch and Henry briefed a reporter from The Washington Post about the attack. On June 14, soon after the Post story publicly linked Fancy Bear with the Russian GRU and Cozy Bear with the FSB for the first time, Alperovitch published a detailed blog post about the attacks.

The story was coordinated with the WP. It was all part of the set up similar to Steele briefing the media at the same time. It was all coordinated.

Alperovitch told me he was thrilled that the DNC decided to publicize Russia's involvement. "Having a client give us the ability to tell the full story" was a "milestone in the industry," he says. "Not just highlighting a rogue nation-state's actions but explaining what was taken and how and when. These stories are almost never told."

The DNC was orchestrating these stories.

The day after the media maelstrom, the reporters were back with less friendly questions: Had Alperovitch gotten his facts right? Was he certain Russia was behind the DNC hacks? The doubts were prompted by the appearance of a blogger claiming to be from Eastern Europe who called himself Guccifer 2.0. Guccifer said that the breach was his, not Russia's. "DNC'S servers hacked by a lone hacker," he wrote in a blog post that included stolen files from the DNC. "I guess CrowdStrike customers should think twice about company's competence," Guccifer wrote. "Fuck CrowdStrike!!!!!!!!!"

If you read the Mueller indictment and compare it to this article written in October 2016, it is almost a mirror image when it comes to the recitation of the facts.

Alperovitch initially thought that the leaks were standard espionage and that Guccifer's attacks on CrowdStrike were just a noisy reaction to being busted. "I thought, Okay, they got really upset that they were caught," he said. But after documents from the DNC continued to leak, Alperovitch decided the situation was far worse than that. He concluded that the Russians wanted to use the leaked files to manipulate U. S. voters—a first. "It hit me that, holy crap, this is an influence operation. They're actually trying to inject themselves into the election," he said. "I believe that we may very well wake up on the morning the day after the election and find statements from Russian adversaries saying, 'Do not trust the result.' "

Were they trying to suggest that a Trump or a Hillary victory would be viewed this way?

113 posted on 07/15/2018 8:40:04 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson