Posted on 07/14/2018 8:48:25 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
... She wrote: "We need to keep our eyes on the prize. If we don't, we risk ending up with no Brexit at all," she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailystar.co.uk ...
“I believe the queen and family are eye candy, with no actual power.”
Actually, the queen can dismiss the prime minister and appoint a new pone.
The queen can veto all parliament bills.
The queen can declare war.
The queen can dissolve the parliament and vote voting for a new one.
I am certain that the actual parliamentary vote was delayed for that very same reason.
Evident of the numb and dumb protesting in the streets, it looked like a NYC greenage village carnaval
There’s confusion between three groups: the Cabinet - all Government Ministers and elected politicians; the civil servants (permanent officials who are non-political) of the Cabinet Office; and May’s private office, who are hired political advisers.
Dear Ms. May,
If you don’t immediately implement a full Brexit, you’re gone.
Last I knew, May, Art. 50, didn’t come with a clause for backsies.
How about the voters just throw your ass out and hard Brexit?
You seem to not understand that there are more options than just the two you are trying to force the British people to choose between.
so Fire May and Sue ,LOL
Neville is in the saddle again.
Suppose the Queen called upon loyal supporters to rise up in resistance against the regime of a corrupt Prime Minister?
Ingenuity plus the will to work with whats at hand.
I like it! (Then what the hell is she waiting for?) Can she dump the male of London?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.