Completely missing from the questioning was the obvious. Gowdy looks to have caught Darrell Issa disease. He did not prepare his questioning and I am quite disappointed. Failing to prepare is saying, in essence, that Strzok would not prepare and that does not even rise to the level of inane. It is stupid.
It is perfectly predictable that Strzok would seek to wrap himself in the honor of the FBI. It is likewise predictable that he would cite his multi-decade record as FBI agent. So when you (as questioner) attack those things with mere innuendo, you are blowing air against the brick wall. It is predictable that the tactic will fail.
Once again: The single task is to get the deponent to contradict themselves, ideally within one (the same) sentence. Period. Nothing else really accomplishes anything.
When Strzok dismisses all the Strzok-Page texts as “out of context” and wraps himself in the tradition and honor of the great men and women of the FBI as a matter of deflection, the question is “So was all of the FBI having sex with Ms Page or was that just you?”
Answer that one, Mr. Strzok.
The Dems on twitter think Strzok beat Gohmert . And praise NJ Bonnie Coleman’s Benghazi comment