[grobdriver]

acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber – including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms – are not inherently military.

Well now, wait.

Didn't the original Miller decision confirm that the Second protects military grade firearms specifically because the militia needs to have military grade firearms?

The whole NFA thing ignores the law in regulating automatic weapons.

So why now is the focus on what is not a military weapon? Second supporters ought to be saying, You bet your ass it's a military weapon - and it should be an automatic weapon without government consent, just like the military provides. That's how we prevent tyranny.

[Blue Collar Christian]

“So why now is the focus on what is not a military weapon? Second supporters ought to be saying, You bet your ass it’s a military weapon - and it should be an automatic weapon without government consent, just like the military provides. That’s how we prevent tyranny.”

I concur, along with millions of our fellow patriots. That fight needs to be ongoing. Our liberties are taken a piece at a time, and will only be restored a piece at a time. Sometimes the fight is to prevent the forward steps of the enemy. Other times the fight is to recover liberties taken from us.

[familyop]

"Second supporters ought to be saying, You bet your ass it's a military weapon - and it should be an automatic weapon without government consent, just like the military provides. That's how we prevent tyranny."

Then after the confirmation in process, we need another good man on the Supreme Court. And for that, we need to make sure that all of our neighbors get the Republican vote going in the midterm elections for members of Congress. There was a good reason for the language used in the case, and it will be discussed at a better time.