Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, the good judge certainly didn't go into law to make a fortune, that's clear!
1 posted on 07/10/2018 1:27:03 PM PDT by NohSpinZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NohSpinZone

I wonder what happened to his finances.....that’s pretty thin reserves for a 53 year old with a wife and two children. Perhaps everything is in his wife’s name?


2 posted on 07/10/2018 1:30:26 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone
🤔. Hmmmm. The fact that he has an account with BoA is suspicious. ⚖ 🍿🍻👹
3 posted on 07/10/2018 1:30:54 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

I like him even better - maybe he’s laying up his treasures in Heaven...


5 posted on 07/10/2018 1:32:43 PM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (Capitalists sign their checks on the front. Socialists sign theirs on the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

He is a catholic, I am sure he gives generously.


12 posted on 07/10/2018 1:41:53 PM PDT by klimeckg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

I do not think Kavanaugh is going into this job for the money, yo.....someone needs to memo/inform GoldsteinIdiot.


14 posted on 07/10/2018 1:43:50 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

https://abovethelaw.com/2013/06/who-is-the-richest-supreme-court-justice/

We said that Ginsburg appears to be the wealthiest justice because of two important caveats: (1) the ambiguity introduced by the reporting of asset values in ranges, as opposed to exact amounts, and (2) the exclusion of primary residences. (RBG’s actual net worth could be as low as $4.4 million and SGB’s could be as low as $5 million, excluding primary residences.)

Here are how the nine justices stack up in terms of their net-worth ranges (ordered by the top of the range):

1. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: $4.4 million to $18.1 million

Justice Ginsburg often tops the list of most affluent justices. Her late husband, Martin Ginsburg, was a renowned tax lawyer who practiced at major Biglaw firms. But note that RBG’s fortune isn’t what it once was: just three years ago, she listed assets worth as much as $45 million, and now she tops out at $18.1 million. Perhaps the Ginsburg gave money away — to family, or to charities — after Marty Ginsburg passed away.

2. Stephen G. Breyer: $5 million to $17.1 million

Justice Breyer spent most of his pre-robescent career in government or academia, so he didn’t have the chance to make Biglaw bucks. His wealth is largely due to his wife, Joanna Freda Hare, who is British aristocracy. His net worth has probably increased since 2006, when it ranged between $4.1 million to $15.4 million (but note that, because of the ranges, we can’t be sure of any increase).

(Props to Justice Ginsburg and Justice Breyer on marrying well. The conservatives haven’t quite mastered that tactic, as we’ll see below.)

3. Sonia Sotomayor: $1.7 million to $10.3 million

Her net worth figure doesn’t reflect her primary residence, a $660,000 condominium in D.C.’s trendy U Street corridor. But it does include her former home in New York, an apartment in Greenwich Village that generates rental income. That apartment is listed in the $1 million to $5 million range (but is probably closer to $1 million, meaning that the Wise Latina’s actual worth is probably well below $10 million).

4. John G. Roberts Jr.: $2.8 million to $6.6 million

The Chief Justice was able to build up his net worth due to some time in private practice, at Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells). And his high-powered wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, is a leading legal recruiter at Major, Lindsey & Africa. Chief Justice Roberts is an avid investor, with holdings in technology and telecommunications stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. His net worth range has moved up a bit from 2006, when it clocked in at $2.2 million to $5.9 million.

5. Antonin Scalia: $1.9 million to $4.2 million

Like many a conservative, Justice Scalia is a gold bug, with investments in gold-related securities worth between $80,000 and $215,000, and a firearms fan — he accepted a gift of a $1,000 shotgun from the National Wild Turkey Federation. His total net worth is definitely higher now than it was in 2006, when it ranged between $700,000 and $1.6 million.

6. Elena Kagan: $815,000 to $2.1 million

I’d guess that Lady Kaga’s net worth is closer to the high end of the range. At the time of her Supreme Court nomination, she was already worth about $1.8 million. (Query whether she has purchased a primary residence in the interim; the value of that residence would not be reflected in her financial disclosure.)

7. Clarence Thomas: $715,000 to $1.8 million

Like fellow conservative Scalia, Thomas is a fan of gold, with investments in gold- and silver-related securities worth between $60,000 and $200,000. His net worth is up significantly since 2006, when it ranged between $150,000 and $400,000. Perhaps some of the increase is due to sales of his own bestselling memoir, My Grandfather’s Son (affiliate link), for which he received a $1.5 million advance.

8. Samuel A. Alito Jr.: $380,000 to $1.1 million (based on his 2011 report; he has sought an extension as to 2012)

Why has Justice Alito’s net worth taken a tumble? Back in 2006, he was worth between $650,000 and $1.7 million. (I suspect that some of this divergence may be due to transactions involving primary residences, which are excluded from these figures.)

9. Anthony M. Kennedy: $330,000 to $700,000

Poor Justice Kennedy. The most powerful member of the Court is also the poorest. Maybe someday he’ll write a tell-all memoir about his life as the swing justice and improve his balance sheet. On the bright side, his net worth (1) has climbed a lot since 2006, when it ranged between $65,000 and $200,000 or so, and (2) doesn’t include the value of his million-dollar home.

Congratulations to the justices on their robust net worths. They don’t earn huge sums in their current positions — $223,500 a year for Chief Justice Roberts, and $213,900 a year for each of the associate justices — and they could earn much more on the speaking circuit or at private law firms (where their outgoing law clerks get welcomed with gigantic signing bonuses).

So it’s nice to know that, despite their relatively modest pay, the justices are all right. They’ve sacrificed to serve our country, to be sure, but they can still afford to wear clothing underneath their robes.


21 posted on 07/10/2018 1:47:27 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

And this is news...why?


22 posted on 07/10/2018 1:48:29 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

“less than $15,000 in Vanguard funds within a 401(k) “

Stands to reason considering he would be getting a Judge’s pension on retirement since 2006. While the 401 is nice to have as an additional retirement fund it certainly is not necessary given the generous Judges’s pension.


25 posted on 07/10/2018 1:50:09 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

He should have run for congress. He could have made a fortune.


29 posted on 07/10/2018 1:56:44 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

As David Asman said, “He’s either very stupid — which he isn’t — or very honest.” Most people in his position have money “magically” appear over the years. Apparently he walked the straight and narrow.


32 posted on 07/10/2018 2:01:24 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Have an A-1 day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone
He's probably paying private school tuitions. If so, that would account for a big chunk of his disposable income. My guess is most of his net worth is in his house. Savings may look low, but remember that he's a federal judge, so he's employed for life with a very plush pension system waiting should he decide to retire.

How much time did he practice in the private sector before going into government and then becoming a judge? Private practice is where he's pile up the big money, but he was on the Ken Starr team and then in the Bush Administration. He became a judge from there. The Starr connection runs back about 20 years. He's still relatively young. He may not have had many years in private practice. Was he even a partner in one of the big firms, or did he go into government before that happened?

33 posted on 07/10/2018 2:01:42 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

If he has his Federal judicial pension, and has been socking money away for his kids’ education in their own college funds, and has been paying down his mortgage — I wouldn’t be too worried. He’s probably on more solid financial footing than most Americans his age.


35 posted on 07/10/2018 2:03:24 PM PDT by Sooth2222 (Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone
He has fully paid off a loan from a thrift savings plan...

He borrowed from his TSP account? (for those that have never worked for the federal government that is the retirement savings account you can contribute into and the feds match up to 5%). Gee, he must really be as poor as a church mouse, borrowing from your TSP really is a last resort type thing. I can officially say I'm wealthier than a Supreme Court Justice nominee, and I'm not wealthy....

37 posted on 07/10/2018 2:06:12 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

That’s not a whole lot. Maybe no bribes in his past. Can’t be bought (Just like the Donald).

Not sayin the courts can be bought...right Alcee?

Hastings, Google it.

5.56mm


39 posted on 07/10/2018 2:17:27 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson