Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

They go through this every time. You can’t ask judges for a decision with no case in front of them. And you can’t hold them to a philosophy if you demand that they state one.


12 posted on 07/09/2018 12:52:38 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

Bump!


21 posted on 07/09/2018 12:55:28 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill

It’s the Republican hold backs that will be the fly in the ointment...not the Dems...and those who are up for reelection.


22 posted on 07/09/2018 12:55:37 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill
You can’t ask judges for a decision with no case in front of them. And you can’t hold them to a philosophy if you demand that they state one.

And asking for their personal views is immaterial. Chuckie is a dope. A good SCJ has to ignore their personal views and apply the constitution to the issues brought forth.

77 posted on 07/09/2018 2:37:07 PM PDT by Go Gordon (I gave my dog Grady a last name - Trump - because he loves tweets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson