I just looked Hardiman up on Wikipedia and I am left with the feeling that he is a RINO. Read for your self and see what you think. I might be wrong and hope I am, but most of the decisions he made leave me very concerned.
A Pennsylvania Republican is basically a blue dog democrat everywhere else.
I just read it and I don’t see that. On the immigration/asylum rulings I suspect he was just following the letter of the law. That’s fine, I don’t want judges making up law to suit their political agenda. What are your specific concerns?