Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barrett and Hardiman Rising as Trump Readies Supreme Court Pick
Breitbart ^

Posted on 07/08/2018 7:59:55 PM PDT by springwater13

Sources tell Breitbart News on Sunday that Judges Amy Barrett and Thomas Hardiman have taken the top two positions in the Supreme Court selection process in the final hours before President Donald Trump makes his final choice for a lifetime appointment. Other outlets are reporting different names and numbers, leaving everyone guessing.

At age 46, Barrett would be the youngest justice in almost 30 years. She graduated from Notre Dame Law School, clerked for a federal appeals judge and for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, then returned to Indiana as a law professor at Notre Dame, where she is well known as an ardent supporter of an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. She is a mother to seven children – both biological and adopted – and is affectionately called “Judge Dogma” by some of her admirers for her grueling confirmation ordeal.

Hardiman has distinguished himself on several major issues during his tenure on the bench. Prominent among these is Binderup v. Attorney General, where he wrote that the Second Amendment must be interpreted according to its original public meaning when it was adopted in 1791, striking down a federal gun-control law as applied to two nonviolent criminals for minor offenses when the government conceded that these individuals were not dangerous.

The Washington Post called Hardiman a “Second Amendment extremist,” which may help his chances with the NRA-endorsed President Trump.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrett; fakenews; hardiman; trump; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: 9YearLurker
Hardiman has distinguished himself on several major issues during his tenure on the bench. Prominent among these is Binderup v. Attorney General, where he wrote that the Second Amendment must be interpreted according to its original public meaning when it was adopted in 1791, striking down a federal gun-control law as applied to two nonviolent criminals for minor offenses when the government conceded that these individuals were not dangerous.

The Washington Post called Hardiman a “Second Amendment extremist,” which may help his chances with the NRA-endorsed President Trump.

I like that. How has be been "very bad on illegal immigration "?

21 posted on 07/08/2018 10:32:55 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/04/ann-coulter-slams-open-borders-zealots-on-trumps-scotus-shortlist-backs-kavanaugh/


22 posted on 07/08/2018 10:38:54 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Not a word about Hardiman in that article.


23 posted on 07/08/2018 10:44:13 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hugin; All

In an interview tonight on Fox, Lindsey mentioned he is pro Harriman. That dovetails with their soft immigration stance.


24 posted on 07/09/2018 12:31:34 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
This is from Fox Business about Hardiman for the last vacancy. It seems to be a pretty fair analysis.

Hardiman has an expansive view of the second amendment, believing the right to bear arms extends outside the home. In an opinion he wrote disagreeing with a New Jersey law that requires people to show “justifiable need” to be armed outside the home, Hardiman was alone in his opposition, expressing the view that the need for self-defense exists beyond the confines of the household. In a separate case, he held that even violent felons could regain their second amendment rights so long as they met certain conditions.

In addition, Hardiman notably ruled in favor of a New Jersey prison’s strip-search policy, believing the need for security trumps potential inmates’ rights to privacy. While there have been questions raised by conservatives about Hardiman’s views on immigration due to some legal work he did for a clinic called Ayuda early in his career--- when he helped poor, Spanish-speaking immigrants in political asylum and domestic abuse cases--- he has also written unpublished opinions against non-citizens.

“I don't believe there's much in Hardiman's record to fully gauge him [on immigration]. Ayuda cuts both ways. It could help politically due to the concerns that Trump is anti-immigration,” Philip Holloway, legal analyst at the Holloway Law Group, told FOX Business.

He seems to be an originalist. As long as he follows the law and the constitution, I'm not too worried about his work on behalf of that foundation early in his career. Graham may just be for him because he would be easier to confirm than the others. And the 2A is the biggest issue for me (not that borders aren't). On the whole I think we'll be fine with any of Trump's picks.

25 posted on 07/09/2018 12:52:06 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

On dear, she has health issues?


26 posted on 07/09/2018 3:02:45 AM PDT by Ciexyz (I have one issue and it's my economic well-being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

How could anyone tell?


27 posted on 07/09/2018 3:32:35 AM PDT by epluribus_2 (he had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rainier1789

Imagine a Hillary SCOTUS. Imprisonment for “hate speech.” Mass confiscation of guns. Full voting rights for illegal aliens. Partial birth abortion. This is what the Never Trump crowd wants.


28 posted on 07/09/2018 5:40:04 AM PDT by ksm1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

McConnell is pushing for Hardiman. Apparently he thinks Hardiman will be the easiest to get confirmed.


29 posted on 07/09/2018 6:55:56 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

ALL the most recent head to head predictions include .... wait for it ..... Thomas Hardiman.

I have been telling you.........


30 posted on 07/09/2018 8:20:14 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

It’s going to be Hardiman!
From President Trump’s mouth to my ears.


31 posted on 07/09/2018 8:21:58 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“Hardiman very bad on illegal immigration “

NOT TRUE!


32 posted on 07/09/2018 8:26:42 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

So what’s your answer to Ann Coulter’s assessment on that?


33 posted on 07/09/2018 8:34:43 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

“So far I’ve seen articles saying it’s Kavanaugh and Hardiman, Kethledge and Hardiman, and now Barrett and Hardiman. If I was to bet I’d say Hardiman.”

AHA! Seeing the light!

Until recently, Hardiman was only mentioned in passing. He was left off a lot of people’s lists.

NOW, he is the only common denominator in head to head predictions.

Hardiman was 1st runner up to Gorsuch then, He has been next in line ever since.

In other words, it has been Hardiman since the day Trump chose Gorsuch.


34 posted on 07/09/2018 8:34:51 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Also, Hardiman and Kethledge are the two “moderates” promoted by Mitch—which should tell you all you need to know. Swing/moderates? Yes. Read this and weep:

https://www.bna.com/hardiman-may-moderate-n73014450296/


35 posted on 07/09/2018 8:39:20 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I didn’t see what Coulter said. I don’t put much stock in what she says. You can’t! She is all over the map! Like Newt, I love her sometimes the next thing you know she’s off her meds.

So, I don’t care what she said. I like the Trump position on immigration. Trump will be just fine with Hardiman’s.


36 posted on 07/09/2018 8:40:10 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

If it’s ACB, it would be interesting to see how the communist hens (RBG, Kagen & Soto) will treat her.

Yes, I know it’s rhetorical as we all know the answer to that question.


37 posted on 07/09/2018 8:44:21 AM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" @HOROWITZ39, DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

If you think Trump values what the turtle has to say, you don’t understand Trump.

This is TRUMP’S pick. No one else’s.

It will be Hardiman.


38 posted on 07/09/2018 8:51:03 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

Trump is a master showman, who has successfully made his agenda center stage in the media. Everyone is going to tune in to find out his pick, and he will likely spend half an hour communicating his philosophy to the American people before announcing who it is.


39 posted on 07/09/2018 8:53:42 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Go go Godzilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

My father had a “system” for betting on the horse races.

Sometimes it WON! Over all it LOST! It WAS scientific though.

Maybe he should have considered the political leanings of the Senators from the states where the horses were from or maybe where the jockeys were from or where the owners were from....


40 posted on 07/09/2018 8:58:09 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson