See my post 11 above. So now both Coulter and Breitbart are intellectually lazy liars.
I shouldn't have to do their work for them, which is easy enough for them to do. If they want to tell me what Kethledge held, they could at least read what he wrote and quote him accurately. If he is in error, then show us the error. But, in fact, his reasoning is pretty tight and pretty well grounded in established precedent.
And why do these folks want to defend Agencies from judicial review as provided for under the Administrative Procedures Act. That is a route to unchecked administrative power.
I thought conservatives despised the administrative state and its abuses of unconstitutional powers conferred by a Congress too lazy to do its own job. I guess they are all Bush League conservatives.
What is this conspiracy to get Ketledge? Is Bannon undermining Trump again. I thought Bannon quit.
Guy Benson
@guypbenson
6h
Strong conservative in this realm reaches out in response. Says after closely examining Kethledge’s decade (1000+ decisions), *nothing* is concerning re: originalist/textualist bona fides. Says Gorsuch 2.0 moniker “absolutely” apt & ‘unreliable’ whispers are mystifying. #scotus
.......
I don’t know exactly what Ann and Breitbart are after, but I know Ann is all in for Kavanaugh. She’s not being honest in her criticism, as you point out.
The above tweet summarizes the situation. From everything I’ve read about him, Kethledge should have excited conservatives. That he hasn’t, is indeed “mystifying”...
I don’t know how much influence Bannon has anywhere now, but nothing surprises me. Maybe he’s part of it, or not.
Agree on the administrative state, another area Kethledge shows strength.