Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yetidog

That is the argument I heard recently from a pro-choicer. That under the 14th Amendment (all persons born etc.) the fetus is not a citizen and therefore has no constitutional rights. The mother is a citizen and therefore has the right to determine what medical procedures are best for her. I haven’t really come up with a good rebuttal to that one yet.

This is why I would like to see a constitutional amendment stating that life begins at conception. As far as I know there has been no attempt at this.


24 posted on 07/07/2018 9:19:03 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: OIFVeteran
Close, but no. The argument is about “personhood” not citizenship. Roe depends on the ruling that an unborn child is not a “person.” Citizenship is not relevant, as the case about an illegal alien getting an abortion makes clear.
26 posted on 07/10/2018 5:37:27 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson