[Paul R.]

In their opinion it’s an outdated document by tyrants.

Whereas in fact it's a timeless document to protect against tyrants.

That is the point that seems strangely beyond the comprehension of libs and activists who might be well intentioned but misguided, and angers those not well intentioned.

I can't think of any case where a country with a reasonable Constitution veered away from it and the end result was good. Germany (Rise of the 3rd Reich) being a perfect example.

[Karliner]

I can't think of any case where a country with a reasonable Constitution veered away from it and the end result was good

That should be in bold.*fixed*