My own research I found nothing that assured me one way or the other. I read a lot of mix messages his friends and acquaintances were a mixed lot and he had no political record to speak of.
I have agree and continue to state that he was the best choice, but I say it was a crap shoot no one knew 100% how he was going to preform and face it for many of us that came down to Hilary had to be stopped at all cost.
> “My own research I found nothing that assured me one way or the other. “
That’s not his fault. That’s the fault of the research abilities of yourself and those around you.
> “I read a lot of mix messages his friends and acquaintances were a mixed lot and he had no political record to speak of.”
Again deficiency in research ability. There was and is PLENTY of record in politics, just not in elected office.
Donald Trump knew the political game better than most elected politicians because he had to work with them to get permits for his projects. He knew their corrupt ways, he knew which ones were bought by who, he knew which ones were controlled, compromised.
But he was also a master of business, banking, insurance, trade, taxes, regulations, labor, management, planning.
He was such a master that Congress invited him frequently to testify on what they could do to improve the economy and the business environment.
It was obvious he knew much more about repercussions and side effects of poorly crafted legislation, and this is why he was always invited.
WATCH:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rksd80-FCAw
As to his character, it is evident everywhere in his past as he was interviewed hundreds of times as to his views and methods. Here is one interview, one of many, that is revealing:
WATCH:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4CqF4hjCGI
Your takeaway from all this is to find things to read and practice that will make you a better researcher because all of your comments point to the need for that.