I did write that if the person who had possession of the photo did not have the poser’s consent then that would be a crime. If the person who took the photo sold it or gave it without the poser’s consent that too would be a crime. But it should not be classified as “child pornography”.
But simply taking the photo should not be a crime. If a seventeen year old is presumed mature enough to consent to sex then to remove that presumption because a photo is involved does not make sense to me.
“But simply taking the photo should not be a crime. “
But sharing them with a convicted child molester and kiddie porn trafficker is.
I wonder how many all over the world have seen her all.
How would you feel if your daughters naked photos were turned over to a convicted child molester kiddie porn trafficker?