To: mlo
You can still be the first person in human history to explain an intelligible rationale for the ontological basis of individual human worth in the absence of a transcendent Moral Law Giver.
If you are able.
15 posted on
07/05/2018 11:56:47 AM PDT by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
As stated, apparently, by Dostoyevski and echoed by Sartre:
“If God does not exist, then everything is permissible.”
17 posted on
07/05/2018 11:59:02 AM PDT by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: mlo
Again, the target here is to be able to articulate the ontological basis of individual human worth.
If God doesn’t exist.
18 posted on
07/05/2018 12:00:27 PM PDT by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
"You can still be the first person in human history to explain an intelligible rationale for the ontological basis of individual human worth in the absence of a transcendent Moral Law Giver." Hardly. Like the question hasn't been answered a thousand times already.
36 posted on
07/05/2018 12:48:26 PM PDT by
mlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson