Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servantoftheservant

That it is non-binding and only relates to the bank fraud makes me think co-operating witness. They gave the carrot of the plea on bank fraud still have the stick of other charges on everything else.

https://m.theepochtimes.com/plea-deal-in-house-it-scandal-not-binding-on-other-us-attorneys-offices_2583670.html

The terms of the deal, however, stipulate that it does “not bind the Civil Division of this Office or any other United States Attorney’s Office, nor does it bind any other state, local, or federal prosecutor.”

“It also does not bar or compromise any civil, tax, or administrative claim pending or that may be made against your client,” it states.

This means that other U.S. attorney’s offices or prosecutors could still file charges against Awan if evidence of wrongdoing is found.

In reaching the plea deal with Awan, prosecutors contradicted evidence found by House investigators that Awan and his associates made unauthorized and suspicious logins to congressional IT systems.


68 posted on 07/05/2018 8:15:32 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: edzo4
Thank you! I really hope you're right!!

The Awan case is almost too much to bear if there are not a lot of answers & action.

Widespread embezzlement by Dem House members, the Dem Caucus server missing -- just blatant crime everywhere.

69 posted on 07/05/2018 9:35:42 PM PDT by servantoftheservant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson