I suspect our lefty pals here are trying to figure out a way to centralize/nationalize state elections in the same way they were attempting to do the same to our police departments. "We're the Federal Government and we're here to help [control] you."
“First, they attacked our election infrastructure. They hacked into somewhere between 20 and 40 state board of elections, including, in August of 2016, my own state of Illinois. They hacked and dumped emails into political parties and individuals. They weaponized social media,”
Are you sure it wasn't the Awan family that was doing tis hacking from the safety of the US capitol? It's just a little hard to take seriously the cybersecurity concerns of the fed gov when it covers up a cybersecurity problem that thrived for years in the halls of congress; it's hard to take seriously the cybersecurity cries of a political party that sees nothing wrong with Hillary running a private server and which couldn't keep its server secure at the DNC and which wasn't treated seriously by the fed gov. But let us assume Russia did hack and dump emails - we know from the Russian propaganda posted here that they are about as subtle as the usual liberal and communist propaganda we see from the CCR, the Open Society Institute, the Sierra Club, Palestinian propaganda, and the Manmade Global Warming crowd... or even ploys for money from Nigerians posing as the wives of fallen dictators and that there are always a set of people on all sides willing to fall for it. Big deal. Just delete it.
Quigley told Michael Morell, host of CBS News’ “Intelligence Matters”
Is this Morell the former Obama official involved in Benghazi? Maybe the first step towards restoring trust in government and the press is to put a wall of separation between them, not to mix them together.
I guess it is the same Mike Morell...who openly endorsed Hillary in the last election and who in the Obama admin was replaced by a lawyer, Avril Haines.
And they wonder why no one trusts liberals when they pose as patriots or journalists when they claim to be unbiased, fai and balanced.