“I assume all other sources are also too biased for you, especially if they disagree with your views.”
Wow, once you settle on a fallacy you go all in. Sad.
So you post a link to a google search as evidence of what exactly? That black market cannabis still exists? Well, thanks Captain Obvious. Of course it still exists. Just as people still run illegal booze & cigarettes, there will always be a black market for cannabis.
1st you fallaciously suggest black market cannabis has grown since legalization & post a link to a click-bate website who’s using a Washington Piss story to draw traffic. This suggests to me you did a quick google search & just posted a link without reading the original story at Washington Piss.
Then you move your goalposts to tell me that original link was “proof that Weed is bad for you” when it actually said nothing of the kind (see I read it lol) but only talks about how some black market criminals operate. See what being lazy does for ya?
This is how you go to zero-credibility in 5 posts or less Appy. Congrats! :)
Me: “Hell, the illegal trade is actually increasing because more people are smoking it and don’t want to pay high prices.”
You: Til you can provide evidence to validate this claim I’m calling BS.
Your inability to remember what you said is proof that Weed is bad for you.