Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

Always need a conventional bomber, if even not for standoff nukes like the B-52; which is always an option. The B-52 can’t get there like the B-1 can.


2 posted on 07/04/2018 9:29:52 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SaveFerris

The author’s analysis is flawed.

The idea that we could undertake a strike with 200 heavy bombers against either Russia or China...without going full-on nuclear...is ludicrous.

Such an event is certain to precipitate strategic nuclear war.


5 posted on 07/04/2018 9:37:13 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris

As things move on, things stay the same. We will always need a robust conventional military and be able to fight a two front war yet I believe the military space race is the future.


18 posted on 07/04/2018 11:16:30 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson