Black women have no problem voting for a black man, they turn out in much higher numbers than black men no matter what, at least to my understanding. But I bet black men are more reticent to turnout for a black woman than a black man. So running a black man gets them more minority turnout to my thinking.
Freegards
Ya gotta love identity politics in the US. This is the ONLY country on earth in which “hispanic” is considered to be an ethnic group. pssssst. They’re not. They’re no more an ethnic group than “Americans” are an ethnic group. Most “hispanics” in the US are....wait for it......White.
One of my friends has a cousin he’s close to who married a smokin’ hot cheerleader in college (lucky bastard). Anyway the cheerleader’s dad is from Indiana...but her mom is from Venezuela. Therefore she is “hispanic”. It doesn’t matter that she was born and raised in the states. It doesn’t matter that she’s a blue eyed blonde who looks like she would be closer to Hitler’s aryan ideal than I would be with my extensive German heritage. She’s “hispanic”. Oh their kids? What box are they going to check? Will they check “White” and be discriminated against on every application, or will they check “hispanic” and get easier admissions, the benefit of de facto diversity quotas etc? They’d be fools not to check the “hispanic” box. btw. They’re both at least as far to the Right as I am.
Lots of “hispanics” are relatively recent immigrants. Recent immigrants have always voted for the Left and have always gone ever more to the Right the longer they are in the US and the more they go native. The Democrats are kidding themselves if they think these people are going to be perpetual votes for Leftist candidates.
In addition to that, quotas and their tendency to work hard and achieve - and to be discriminated against as a result, makes Asians the perfect candidates to also shift to the Right in their voting patterns.
This whole demographic argument is IMO, wishful thinking by the Democrats and their propaganda arm, the MSM.