“And why exactly is having 7 kids a plus?”
One reason is that she has ‘skin’ in the game. Normal parents want their children to be free and healthy so they can pursue their life’s ambitions. There would be a better chance of seeing things through that lens.
Generally, people without kids (and I know there are exceptions) won’t sacrifice too much for the future beyond their own life’s expectancy.
You just countered your own argument and again for those of you who insist this woman having seven kids somehow qualifies her for the USSC - the number of children (if any children at all) one has is IRRELEVANT to the role of a United States Supreme Court Justice.
Case in point: Justice Antonin Scalia and his wife had 9 children. Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife had 1 child. Both justices are easily classified as Strict Constructionists and Constitutional Originalists.
Therefore the ONLY requirement for Kennedy's replacement should be "Strict Constructionist and Constitutional Originalist" in the mold of Antonin Scalia or Clarence Thomas, period.
Not whether or not they have a vagina, have had seven children or the rest of the identity politics BULLSHIT being displayed on this thread.