Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated
Well, I did mention regulatory reform - which dramatically affects the spending side...

Come again? I can maybe see savings for the regulated industries but government spending?

You might be able to cut a few bureaucrats but civilian federal payroll is an inconsequential part of a $4T budget.

If the constitutional limits on the size of government were enforced, the government would be something on the order of 1/20th the size it is.

And there would be a revolution and the U.S. would be no more. You can't believe that there would be support for a 95% reduction in government services, and without popular support the Constitution means nothing.

...if we can both agree that spending is the problem - whether funded by taxes or debt - then why do you care so much which it is?

One is sustainable, one isn't.

66 posted on 06/30/2018 3:49:57 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

“One is sustainable, one isn’t.”

That’s simply not true. Neither method of funding the spending is sustainable when the spending itself is unsustainable - which it clearly is.


67 posted on 06/30/2018 4:07:25 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson