Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.M. Says New Wave of Tariffs Could Force U.S. Job Cuts
New York Times ^ | June 29, 2018 | Tiffany Hsu

Posted on 06/29/2018 1:16:05 PM PDT by reaganaut1

General Motors warned Friday that another wave of tariffs being considered by the Trump administration could force the company to scale back its business and cost American jobs.

In comments submitted to the Commerce Department, the automaker said that the tariffs, if approved, could drive individual vehicle prices up thousands of dollars, stifling demand. Such costs would need to be borne either by consumers or the company.

Last month, President Trump ordered an investigation into whether imported cars and automotive components could pose enough of a national security risk to warrant tariffs of as much as 25 percent. If he goes ahead, it would intensify a global trade war that has engulfed allies and adversaries. In recent months, the administration has imposed tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, along with measures targeted at China.

Carmakers, in particular, have been caught in the middle of the trade fight. They rely heavily on metals to build their cars, including parts from overseas. The president’s threat to pull out of the North American Free Trade Agreement could also hurt the industry supply chain.

Several other automakers and manufacturing organizations, including the National Association of Manufacturers, BMW and Volvo, have also submitted comments on the tariffs under consideration for foreign automakers and part suppliers.

“Increased import tariffs could lead to a smaller G.M., a reduced presence at home and abroad for this iconic American company, and risk less — not more — U.S. jobs,” General Motors wrote in its comment.

The tariffs would result in “broad-brush trade barriers that increase our global costs, remove a key means of competing with manufacturers in lower-wage countries, and promote a trade environment in which we could be retaliated against in other markets,” the company said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gm; tariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: House Atreides

China’s went up and the US’s stagnated. Is there a point to that? Every post Communist economy had a growth spurt. Russia had a recovery as well as Eastern Europe. As we are starting to see with Trump wage growth was stymied by high taxes and regulation not because we could buy cheap textiles and plastic stuff.


41 posted on 06/29/2018 5:15:23 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

>>>Just buy American steel and aluminum and you don’t have to pay that additional cost. Plus shipping costs will be less

American steel has gone from $600 a ton a year ago to over $900 today.

http://www.cmegroup.com/apps/cmegroup/widgets/productLibs/esignal-charts.html?code=HRC&title=JUL_2018_U.S._Midwest_Domestic_Hot-Rolled_Coil_Steel_%2528CRU%2529_Index_&type=p&venue=0&monthYear=N8&year=2018&exchangeCode=XNYM


42 posted on 06/29/2018 5:53:29 PM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

Just saw cost of Chinese steel has fallen 35% so the 25% tariffs shouldn’t matter


43 posted on 06/29/2018 6:07:46 PM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
the automaker said that the tariffs, if approved, could drive individual vehicle prices up thousands of dollars, stifling demand. Such costs would need to be borne either by consumers or the company.

Kind of funny coming from a company who constantly advertises $9K and more off their trucks as a standard practice....if they stop overpricing their product to make it look like they are giving good deals, nobody would notice when the tariffs affect costs....

44 posted on 06/30/2018 3:50:18 AM PDT by trebb (Too many "Conservatives" who think their opinions outweigh reality these days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

GM’s problems are mostly self inflicted. Design quality in, keep costs down, sell products the public wants....how difficult is that?


45 posted on 06/30/2018 6:10:47 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

>> if your class is nothing but free trade shibboleths, then I wouldn’t bother taking it, as there is nothing to be learned <<

Economics 301 is usually about price behavior in competitive, partially competitive, and monopolistic markets. It does not get into international trade.


46 posted on 06/30/2018 7:15:13 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

>> If you think you can tax yourself to prosperity then you are not just tired but wornout <<

Agreed, but I guess there is no cure for willful stupidity.


47 posted on 06/30/2018 7:19:21 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/10/tesla-to-open-shanghai-electric-car-factory-doubling-its-production


48 posted on 07/11/2018 7:09:11 PM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson