Is the measure of how many children a woman has the determining factor of whether or not they'll be pro-abortion?
Sandra Day O'Connor had three children and numerous grandchildren and was the leading voice on the court for pro-abortion "rights" during her term. She was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981 and served on the court until 2006. She was believed to be pro-life at the time of her appointment and rapidly swung the other way.
If you're using the number of children she has as the determining factor of whether or not she's strictly pro-life, your logic is IMO fatally flawed.
She's 46. In a few short years she'll be going through "the change" and as a man who was married to the same woman for 30 years (and divorced) who went through it, the emotional, physical, hormonal and life-changing effects a woman goes through dramatically affects their outlook on life and frankly, changes their opinions on things often doing a complete 180 degree turn.
That's not male chauvinism, misogyny or "hatred" of women in any way, that's just a FACT. That's what happens and any woman would say the same if they were being 100% honest. (We men already know it after living with it.)
The fact that Sandra Day O’Connor had three children did not make her an anomaly because at that time women used to have more children. These days, most women with seven children are either very devout believers or reckless welfare cases.
For my part, got divorced from a mostly nice moderate to squishy guy, remarried a very nice guy who loves the Lord and, thanks to my now rock-solid convictions, have helped him turn into a confirmed pro-life, pro-God defined marriage supporter and pro-Second Amendment voter!
He also loved finding out I had a life membership in the NRA and membership in GOA, when asking me to marry him!
Before menopause, I was definitely a strong conservative but have become an activist and a proud card-carrying member of Hillary’s “basket of deplorables”!