Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Democrats do not need to meet with the nominee nor have any part in the confirmation process.


67 posted on 06/27/2018 3:17:14 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Liberal bastions are full of misogyny, drugs, pedophilia and racism (Hollywood, Academia, DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Erik Latranyi
Democrats do not need to meet with the nominee nor have any part in the confirmation process.

Technically true.

The first Senate hearings on a Supreme Court nomination occurred in 1968. Lyndon Johnson attempted to name Associate Justice Abe Fortas, his longtime fixer, to replace Chief Justice Earl Warren. The Republicans and Southern Democrats teamed up to prevent the lame duck Johnson from turning the Court even further left than it was. The hearings stopped Warren's replacement cold, and it was Nixon who named Warren Burger as his replacement.

There is no requirement for the Senate to hold hearings on judicial nominees, and the Republicans should set the precedent of ending the practice.

70 posted on 06/27/2018 3:23:02 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson