Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb
Slavery and the slave hunters was a significant problem.

Why were they a particular problem? An affront, yes, but a problem? I don't see it.

Remember too, the threat of Indian attack was very real.

My family and others had to form the NE Iowa Protection Association that was no less a militia to also protect from marauding thieves and bandits.

Loss of Federal protection would not have been sensible.

The guy who writes at "Curmudgeonly and Skeptical" blog is a freeper, (though I don't know his freeper name) but years ago he offered this pearl of wisdom.

"Why don't all the sane states get together and pull a reverse secession by kicking all the insane states out of the Union? "

Seems like a pretty good idea to me. :)

BTW, I have a friend from Waterloo Iowa.

742 posted on 07/02/2018 11:12:12 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Fugitive Slave Act of 1850:

Any person aiding a runaway slave by providing food or shelter was subject to six months’ imprisonment and a $1,000 fine.

Slave catchers often acted without restraint much the same as today’s bounty hunters. There was violence.


746 posted on 07/02/2018 12:41:13 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson