At least you admit there was some changing. However it involved more than just the change you mention.
Their fugitives to explicitly slaves was the biggest change by far and that was an ACCURATE paraphrase. I can’t believe you’re still trying to argue this 2 days later considering you have no argument.
Oh I’m focused. Its just that you can’t give us any difference of substance...there was no change of meaning. If one read the entire statement one would see he said “their fugitives” to mean “slaves”. It wasn’t really necessary to read the whole thing. “Slaves” could just be substituted and the reader would get the exact same meaning. No amount of tapdancing on your part is going to change that.
I can’t help but notice you spout typical PC Revisionist dogma.
Sure I know. Its what you’ve been doing. You accused me of making an inaccurate statement...of misrepresenting what he said. I didn’t. When I challenged you to show us what the difference was, you couldn’t provide anything substantive.
I understand attempts to tapdance and weasel - that’s what you’re trying to do here. You, I and everybody else knows what the myth of the virtuous North is. Sorry, but we’re just not going to go down that particular rabbit hole for 5 days in a row back and forth 50 times like I know you’re dying to. No matter how hard you PC Revisionists try to spin, the facts just don’t support you. Sorry.
It sure sounds like you are butt-hurt from something. Sorry to cause you such anguish. But anytime I catch you randomly snatching some scrap of text and attributing it to Abe, I will call you on it. Meanwhile, work on re-establishing your credibility here.