Well, I do have some clue. For instance he does state a claim for the defamation.
Second, he claims that much of the harassment that he endured was in retaliation against him for testifying against the Clinton which he was compelled to do as a secret service agent in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1513 which is a specifically prohibited act under the RICO statute.
But, it is rather a rambling complaint, and takes some 40 pages of [irrelevant and unhelpful] narrative before he gets to the first allegation of the complaint.
And I cannot find much about his attorney. His practice seems to be all over the board and this would not appear to be an area he specializes in. The firm of which he claims to be managing partner does not have website.
So, yes I have a clue, it looks like an uphill battle and of course the first step will be motions to dismiss for lack of standing [he certainly has standing on the defamation claim, which he asserts is brought under Arkansas law] and minimally states a claim for defamation. But the RICO stuff ....
Agree with everything you posted. Most of the commenters here don’t have a clue about RICO.
I tried to find out more about his attorney. Not much to be found; and it’s a very poorly drafted complaint.