Posted on 06/21/2018 12:17:51 PM PDT by advance_copy
While generally cautious about criticizing Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on the Clinton-emails investigation, Trump supporters have taken aim at its chief logical flaw: Although key investigators harbored anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias, and even made statements indicating an intention to act on that bias, the IG did not find that this bias was the proximate cause of any particular investigative decision.
This conclusion is easy to rebut; I did so myself in a column last week. Yet, the Trump camp should also be embracing it. Why? Because if this is the Justice Department’s position, then Special Counsel Robert Mueller has no business investigating the president for obstruction.
The IG’s rationale has been vulnerable to attack because of the way it has been distorted by FBI director Christopher Wray and congressional Democrats. They blithely assert that the IG found no bias in the FBI’s decision-making. That claim insults our intelligence.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Mueller, meanwhile, clearly feels he was appointed for life, or until the entire USA dies from boredom.
It took Rosenstien less than one day to select Mueller to be the special counselor. That’s all the evidence I need to prove that Comey, Muller, and Rosenstien conspired to frame Trump.
We have an ever-burgeoning superfluity of shoulds in the Federal Swamp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.