someone needs to ask if the wording had not been changed from grossly negligent to extremely careless if that could have affected prosecutors decision to not prosecute?
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the sources said.
IMHO it’s alot deeper than that. Like Lisa Page told Strzok, don’t go into Clinton interview loaded for bear, she may be the next President.
If that is the mindset of the Investigators, who really believes they even asked challenging questions? Was she put under oath? As Gowdy said, read the 302s. Fact is they tossed softballs at her. Did not challenge her when she claimed she didn’t remember EVER being instructed or trained on Handling Classified Material or having communications over unsecure systems.
Then letting Mills and Samuelson sit in on the interview...TWO people who were directly involved in those communications and the Destruction of evidence once supaenaed.
There is where the bias DID materially effect the actions before the Prosecutors decided to not charge...