The ruling is nonsensical. If the, so-called, judge is claiming that proving citizenship is too much of a burden to infringing civil rights then requiring a background check to purchase a gun is just as much, if not more a violation of infringing civil rights.
If the judge is claiming that there’s no need for a law because there’s no provable instance of the crime cocuring - that’s facetious on its face. Might as well say there’s no need for a law against murder because no one’s been killed in the county this year.
Worse - you MUST PROVE RESIDENCY to vote which is tantamount to citizenship. Where’s the excessive burden?
I demand the judge go back to school to learn basic logic skills.
WTH don’t we just issue every citizen a passport at birth, at no out of pocket cost to the citizen, update it periodically at no out of pocket cost, and require voters to bring their dang passport with them to the polls.
Freaking probkem solved.
It's not a ruling - it's a "Feelz".