Just like Starbucks, the FBI will be going through some anti-bias training. Based on the DoJ-IG report I am confused. Will the anti-bias training be for the bias that doesn’t exist, didn’t happen, or wasn’t found? Do they mean THAT bias? Is there any doubt that Emailgate and Russiagate carried two standards of justice, and bias was on full display in both botched investigations?
It’s a very perplexing, impossible to solve, vexing conundrum if I’ve ever seen one.
It’s almost as impossible to determine as the reason behind a muslim terrorist attack.
Just like Starbucks, the FBI will be going through some anti-bias training. Based on the DoJ-IG report I am confused. Will the anti-bias training be for the bias that doesn’t exist, didn’t happen, or wasn’t found? Do they mean THAT bias? Is there any doubt that Emailgate and Russiagate carried two standards of justice, and bias was on full display in both botched investigations?
—
No, no, no. I’ll explain it to you. They’re having anti-bias training in case, by some weird fluke, some actual pro-America, pro-Trump or pro-Republican gets in there somehow. That needs to be weeded out in case it hurts some future Democratic candidate down the road.
Just like the left defines “racism” in only one direction, I’m sure they define “political bias” the same way. Anyone who doesn’t approve of the left’s attempts to undermine our President and destroy our country is, to them, the very definition of unacceptably biased.
Bias with malice!!!