I tend to agree...most families want to find the trigger-guy.
In this case, they want to have a clean slate that says that Seth Rich had nothing to do with WikiLeaks. The significance of this is not apparent.
I think none of this discussion would be going on today if the robber-dude who shot Rich supposedly....had just robbed him. The fact that nothing was stolen...muddles up the whole story.
As for WikiLeaks suggesting Seth Rich was on their team? Well...if this was made up....then why suggest it? Somewhere out there....there is a missing hour of walking time that Seth Rich had, and no one can account for that time or who he might have been talking to.
Even IF the two banditos who shot Seth were ONLY robbing him... the fact remains that AFTER he left the bar and BEFORE he got 'robbed', Seth was beaten up (what the alphabet agencies call 'interrogation'). None of the 'media' or his family seem interested in investigating that facet of the incident.
Just suppose Aaron’s lawyer is the smartest guy in the room and he is using Aaron to get information that the cops reputedly were not interested in tracking down.
I suspect the lawyers on both sides will be serving papers on on a long list. The discovery process works for both sides.