That is kind of how I read the article. The writer says Trump is not a “paragon of lawfulness. Well, I’d like to see the list of laws that he’s broken.....which is kind of what you’re asking, I think. The rest of the article says that Trump is within the law when he did a, b, c, d, e, f, g. So what’s the problem, again?
whatever Trump is seen as by most, in regards to the law, he created a multi billion dollar business without breaking the law. His kids never broke the law. That alone should make him a paragon.
How do i know he hasn’t broken the law? If he had done so much as to allow an employee to take a bribe, or offer one, the dems would be all over it like they are this manufactured offense they are trying to pin on him
This author is not thinking and is throwing around words
Just thinking it is possible for trump to bend the law does not allow us to hint that he might have
But who in their right mind thinks the dems wouldnt know every action he ever took and let some indescretion pass?
Thats just silly