If that is true, then Trump is indeed guilty of high crimes.
No not at all. I wouldn't assume that Trump isn't doing the best that he can under the circumstances...or that he doesn't have some future action planned to fight the Deep State.
Not sure why you would.
1. Was the attempted Hussein coup a revolutionary act of war that constitutes treason for all who participated in levying, aiding and providing comfort? If not, then Spygate is simply another example of Watergate+ style political shenanigans. No harm, no foul, a couple of wrist slaps and pardons all around. However, if yes, then:
2. Is Trump actively upholding his constitutional oath of office to defend the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Or is he derelict in his responsibilities, and should be removed from office to allow other constitutional agents to perform their rightful duties.
The problem I have is with Eyores who accept the seriousness of the charges levied in point #1, yet somehow revert to a fallback position that ensuing war will not be fully prosecuted, and those guilty of treason will be allowed to escape unscathed. If that is true, then these kinds of posters are actually articulating a position that Trump is violating his sworn constitutional duties.
So, what is it? If one does not hold the position that Trump has abdicated, then should we assume he is actively engaged? If that is true, then why all the doubt? Here's the thing: Trump is both morally and duty bound to pursue justice. He cannot just sweep it away; We the People are the sovereign and true target of which the coup was aimed. He must act as our primary elected official to defend US.