In my opinion, no, 21 years is simply a good start. However I do love how the media spins this by describing her as a “grandmother with a non-violent drug conviction.” Yeah, that’s one way to put it. Another would be “grandmother who was a kingpin in an international, multi-million dollar cocaine smuggling ring”.
Meh... the longest sentence you could get in the old USSR was a tenner, 10 years. In the old west, prison sentences of over 5 years were rare to unheard of.
20 is enough. Especially when you consider three of the last 4 presidents have been coke users, and the one before that was a CIA leader who paired with Bill Clinton to smuggle uncountable tons of cocaine into Mena Arkansas. And all of these guys are free as a bird.
The banks who knowingly laundered the cocaine cartel money are free as a bird.
So yeah, 20 is enough.
That was nuts. And why would the left describe her as that? Why NOT try to paint her in as bad of a light as possible - and then blame Trump for letting her off?
I wonder how many kids died because of “her” drugs? Yeah - I think 20 years is a good start. BTW, if that photo is recent - she looks really good for a 63 year old!
With that cross around her neck, I say leave her in prison to preach the gospel to the lost souls there.