If reports are true that (many) others have turned and are now providing supporting evidence, then why wouldn't Sessions himself by among that group? Is he so committed that he's willing to go down like Goebbels (killed his wife and six children) in an aborted flame of glory? To what end; to what purpose?
I repeat: it makes no logical sense. Perhaps it might if this was merely a standard political gotcha. You know, no harm no foul, everyone meets up afterward for a drink and some laughs.
However, if you believe the attempted coup was in actuality an act of war, then Sessions' has brass cajones so large he'd need a wheelbarrow to carry them.
No not at all.
My position that I've held for many months is that I take Jeff Sessions at his word. Sessions says that he is recused and I believe him.
I don't think that Sessions is an active participant in the coup. I think that on those matters, he has left the building and that he has left us in the hands of Rod Rosenstein.
I think Sessions rationalizes all of that as the right thing to do. I don't think he's right.